Equal marriage debate: Family choice targeted over other values

There is a tendency to assume that family and sexual choices are in a different category than, or not as important as, other freedoms – especially when religion is the opponent.

We take it for granted that the Catholic Church and other religious institutions are against equal marriage, and that they somehow have a “right” to be against it, because of the tenets of their religion. Oh, we moan on Facebook and shake our heads in disgust and sign petitions, but what levels of outrage wuld we reach if any of this happened:

People who like eating pork or shellfish are denied freedom to eat pork or shellfish because Leviticus (which forbids homosexuality) forbids it

A new law bans tattoos because Leviticus forbids it

We are not allowed to wear mixed-fibre clothing because it is forbidden by Leviticus


And, looking beyond Leviticus at the rest of the Old Testament, how would we react to this:

Religious people saying that murdering male children and raping female children should be legal

…Or that genocide or slavery should be legal.


Once again, sex and family choice has been compartmentalized by religion and certain NGOs while other Biblical commandments are being ignored by these same interest groups. And, as a society, a lot of us fail to realise exactly how much sex and the family are being targeted in comparison to other values. We’ve largely allowed ourselves to become hoodwinked into believing that opposing sexual/family choice in the name of religion is somehow normal.

As well as debating why people of the same sex should not be denied the rights given to heterosexuals, it might be useful to tackle the opposition about why they have placed homosexuality above all the other values of Leviticus in the first place. This will make them have to justify why homosexuality trumps all other Biblical/Levitican commandments. This will shift the debate onto the issue of why they even need to debate/oppose equal marriage, instead of the current focus on the points of their argument.



Published by Slutocrat

Slutocrat (n). One who supports slutocracy. Slutocracy (n). 1. A government comprised of sluts. 2. A democracy in which family and sexual freedoms are protected by the State. I have a writing addiction and occasionally manage to get paid for it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: